Doesn’t it drastically sway the balance of power if the courts can not revue what other branches do?
Like the Patriot Act and this “Bail Out” Bill even though Congress schob.Auch if any sentence that the courts are not allowed to monitor what happens, as when a person because of Patriot Act, the accused?
Tags: balance, branches, courts, Doesn't, drastically, power, Revue, sway
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, August 4th, 2010 at 12:30 am and is filed under Revue.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
It could happen. If there are a lot of people in Congress who are willing to work alongside the Bush administration…
THIS IS B.S.!!!!! HOW CAN THEY PASS THIS??
This would rule the courts useless. we’re gonna be a buncha pinkos. this is aubsurd. this would give the other branches WAAAYYYY too much power, and thats not what the need.
dude, fire up the presses, call CBS and NBC, cuz this is not right.
I think ‘unconstitutional’ is the word you are looking for.
It’s too late folks.
http://news.yahoo.com/story//ap/bank_change
This consolidation of financial power should wake you the fvck up now.
It does, and it bothers.
For a second time, the Supreme Court has given the Democrats a booster shot by ordering Cheney & Bush not to destroy certain documents and still Congress has taken no action.
Eventually, the Courts can only go so far with their rulings before, even they are voted out of the Check & Balances when it comes to Government. It has been proving time and again when such laws as mentioned are passed thru Congress w/o oversight.